Please explain how this is a troll diary.  Now.

If you're going to toss off insults, you'd better back 'em up.

Exactly how is this a rehash of anything?  I'm talking about today and tomorrow not yesterday.

So are you saying you are a big donor or big bundler?

If not then this diary is not directed at you at all.

Bull.  Nobody is being called out besides those who would actively hurt the Dem chances to win this Fall.  

If it wasn't for a bunch of dead-ender Hillary supporters, there would be no 'rehash mode.'  You bunch have a habit of keeping the topic alive by puling and whining about how you just can't support Obama...

I don't think the diary accomplishes much, so its not getting a rec, but its certainly not trollish. I see nothing but pumas TRing this. A call to action for democrats to support the democratic nominee is not a troll diary, whether or not it offends your delicate sensibilities.

In this case, the messenger is distracting from the message.

Imagine that George W. Bush wanted to speak at the Democratic National Convention, even if he wanted to speak out about Global Warming and Oil Companies immorality. Bush is perceived as a gret unifier, and ReapBot has indicated that his past is considerably divisive as well.

Not the day after she dropped out, but I donated within the week.

So let's be careful painting with too broad a brush here. Keep in mind some of her donors don't want to help retire her debt either.

I think it is admirable of her to want to try to pay it back, but since her campaign is over, I don't know what to tell her," Fye says. "As far as donating any further, I'm now shifting my support to another candidate."

Joseph Bringman of Seattle, Wash., says he was glad to have donated while Clinton was running. But he says he's not about to write another check. "Given the way the campaign was misdirected early on, when Clintons campaign coffers were full," he says. "I'm not inclined to contribute further solely for debt relief.

So what's more important? Retiring the debt of the multi-millionaire Clintons ,

- Apparently a lot of her donors and supporters believe retiring the debt of the " multimillionaire dollar Clinton " is no less important .

" That's not the way it works "

- Yeah , and your own way is the one that makes the most sense to the Clinton supporters holding back.

To hell with her debt , you would fill Obama's coffers whether you like it or not .

lol.

Look both activities are important to both camps and as long as the effort on the Obama side of things is as underwhelming as the NY Times reported with all the blind quotes from supportrs I suspect some of the bundlers on the Clinton side  would not be inclined to move.

you misunderstand. some had maxed out on  =Barack, but not Hillary and some on Hillary but not Barack.  So, it would have been a trade that took nothing away from either candidate.  It's stupid not to see it that way, if Barack's donors would have, they would have known that a donation to retire her debt would net the same amount or far greater for their candidate. But, it does require good will.  And not a sense of moral superiority.  

instead yet another opportunity for unity went by and those who did in the main contribute to Hillary's debt were her most passionate supporters, and so it did nothing for unity, only solidified the sense that Hillary isn't given respect and Baracks's problems, whatever they may be, will continue to be blamed on her, as if that were the point all along, to keep Hillary's name out there to be bashed, through surrogates now that she'd clearly behind him winning.

It's silly, temper tantrum politics, and to paraphrase Barack,  I'm not against politics, just stupid politics.  

Agreed.

And, I am not worried about money or the polls.

I AM worried about the fact the press obcesses about NON-issues for Obama (magazine covers) and acts like amnesiacs for McCain gaffes (had McCain actually LOOKED at a world map since 1974?)

fine she has 35 million, eats the 10 million to vendors and the debt and what still have 15 million,

my family hasn't even hit the $50,000 mark yet so once again, I don't think Obama should ever think about sending out a fundraising email to his small donors, I am all for the big guys steping up.

but I dont care if they were left with only (HA only) $5 million from paying their debt.

1) she CHOSE to stay in
2) Bill can easily raise more money by more dubious speaking engagments and she can penn another book

everyone has their own choices but I would never support asking people barely getting by to pay the debt of a multi-millionare

lucky for them its not up to me

Not really. They have about a billion in future earning potential...they have more money than they'll ever need.

Don't you realize we're not winning Latinos too much enough?

Two to one isn't good enough.  We need 126% of ALL LATINOS and we can only GET that if we listen to the PUMAs and other former Clinton supporters who won't let it go!

no, I don't expect any such thing out of you.

I know what to expect when I come to these blogs, and I should have stopped myself before I did so.

Have a good day.

Senator Clinton's margin for victory in Indiana was voters who, when asked if they would vote for McCain or Clinton in the general, said they'd vote for McCain after voting for Clinton in the primary.

Well, I understand that being of one particular persuasion can color your perspective on the Indiana vote. However, could you for once consider that Hillary's support was actually genuinely for her. That being said, her supporters had already established the trend of voting for McCain. This even was at the time that a majority of core Democrats preferred her. So, thus, it could have very well been actually stauchly democratic voters making this assessment and decision. It often good to think outside the box from time to time. Of course, no pun intended.

I'm talking about before Operation Charos-the Obama lovers love to bring that up ignoring his pre-Iowa lovefest from the conservative media.

the title of this diary is mean-spirited and plain unnecessary.

Guess you're right.

They hate the Democratic Party, basically.

That's the difference with the Repubs, tho.

They hate McCain, but they're still giving to the party, which is why the RNC is raising tons of money compared to McCain.

They don't like McCain, but they'd rather have a seat at the table with someone they don't like than no seat at the table at all.

Be nice if the Democrats ever played to win like that.

What uncertainty?  The rules were clear and agreed to by both sides.

Say what?

The bad actors were the state parties/legislatures in Michigan and Florida.  You'd see that, but you were in Hillary's camp at the time, so deep apparently that you not only missed it then but you miss it now.

No one has the 'right' position, there are only opinions, and I'd take the one that brings most on board for a common purpose.  It's insulting them to say they need to be courted, and then that you're not going to court them.  First you insult them and then use your insult to make them wrong and insult them again?  This kind of thing goes on in bad marriages right before divorce lawyers get involved, it does not belong in politics.  People need to get over themselves and think of the people who need government, for survival.  

trying to make a point.

Maybe you should overreach a little more trying to make everyone out to be a racist.